Credit , funding , margin , and capital valuation adjustments for bilateral portfolios
نویسندگان
چکیده
We apply to the concrete setup of a bank engaged into bilateral trade portfolios the XVA theoretical framework of Albanese and Crépey (2017), whereby so-called contra-liabilities and cost of capital are charged by the bank to its clients, on top of the fair valuation of counterparty risk, in order to account for the incompleteness of this risk. The transfer of the residual reserve credit capital from shareholders to creditors at bank default results in a unilateral CVA, consistent with the regulatory requirement that capital should not diminish as an effect of the sole deterioration of the bank credit spread. Our funding cost for variation margin (FVA) is defined asymmetrically since there is no benefit in holding excess capital in the future. Capital is fungible as a source of funding for variation margin, causing a material FVA reduction. We introduce a specialist initial margin lending scheme that drastically reduces the funding cost for initial margin (MVA). Our capital valuation adjustment (KVA) is defined as a risk premium, i.e. the cost of remunerating shareholder capital at risk at some hurdle rate.
منابع مشابه
netting rules and re-hypothecation
In this paper we describe how to include funding and margining costs into a risk-neutral pricing framework for counterparty credit risk. We consider realistic settings and we include in our models the common market practices suggested by the ISDA documentation without assuming restrictive constraints on margining procedures and close-out netting rules. In particular, we allow for asymmetric col...
متن کاملXVA : About CVA , DVA , FVA and Other Market Adjustments
Since the crisis, different adjustments are needed to account for counterparty risk and funding costs in the risk management of OTC derivatives, notably credit valuation adjustment (CVA), debt valuation adjustment (DVA) and funding valuation adjustment (FVA). These adjustments, which are, to some extent, interdependent and must be computed jointly, count today among the main P&L centers of inve...
متن کاملBilateral counterparty risk valuation with stochastic dynamical models and application to Credit Default Swaps
We introduce the general arbitrage-free valuation framework for counterparty risk adjustments in presence of bilateral default risk, including default of the investor. We illustrate the symmetry in the valuation and show that the adjustment involves a long position in a put option plus a short position in a call option, both with zero strike and written on the residual net value of the contract...
متن کاملCounterparty Credit Risk in OTC Derivatives under Basel III
Recent financial crises were the root of many changes in regulatory implementations in the banking sector. Basel previously covered the default capital charge for counterparty exposures however, the crisis showed that more than two third of the losses related to this risk emerged from the exposure to the movement of the counterparty’s credit quality and not its actual default therefore, Basel I...
متن کاملArbitrage-Free Bilateral Counterparty Risk Valuation under Collateralization and Application to Credit Default Swaps∗
We develop an arbitrage-free valuation framework for bilateral counterparty risk, where collateral is included with possible re-hypothecation. We show that the adjustment is given by the sum of two option payoff terms, where each term depends on the netted exposure, i.e. the difference between the on-default exposure and the pre-default collateral account. We then specialize our analysis to Cre...
متن کامل